What a Crime

The word 'criminal' conjures many images. Hardened lawbreakers pacing their cells and career felons menacing the public and preying on the unsuspecting. Men in 1920s zoot suits dancing while trying to save a little girl named Annie (Sorry... That last one refers to Michael Jackson's Smooth Criminal). Whatever our preconceived notions, we have a certain specific idea of what a bonafied criminal should look like.

Several cities in America have instituted measures and laws criminalizing certain elements of homelessness, especially in public places. The criminalization of homelessness refers to measures which prohibit life-sustaining activities such as sleeping/camping, eating, sitting, and/or asking for money/resources in public spaces. I have researched a few of these ordinances that are common in many places and my intention is not to cast judgement, but to present the the information and let you decided the validity of the these laws.

In some places, living or sleeping in public places within city limits is illegal. Law enforcement has the right to perform out sweeps of city areas in which homeless people dwell. These sewers consist of confiscating personal property including tents, bedding, papers, clothing, medications, etc. The intent is to make communities safer by relocating the homeless, often moving them outside city limits. But what about the safety of those homeless who have been moved?

Panhandling within city limits is illegal in numerous cities around the country. High-traffic areas such as parking lots and busy intersections are often inhabited by homeless people looking for money or work. Again, public safety is an issue, but there also is an issue of unsightliness. When consumers are asked for money public places, it is bad for business and might hamper people from shopping. But should people be allowed to solicit funds or make requests for work in places with more chances to succeed?

Another common law I found made it illegal for groups to share food with homeless people in public spaces. These cities enforce a “quality of life” ordinance relating to public activity and hygiene. Issues of health and public congregation are sighted to curtail large gatherings of homeless. Many people break this law by venturing out and providing food and resources in spite of laws designed to keep this activity from happening.

I understand the need for law and order, and applaud those peace officers who dedicate their lives to keeping us safe. It is a difficult job worthy of commendation and respect. The point of contention stems from an idea that says the homeless are not members of the community. And while different locales wrestle with this issue, one question looms large: are these offenses worthy of being labeled 'criminal?'

Over the past 25 years, cities across the country have penalized people who are forced to carryout out life-sustaining activities on the street and in public space even though these very communities lack adequate affordable housing and shelter space. Ultimately, many of these measures are designed to move homeless persons out of sight, and at times out of a given city. But just because someone is unseen does not mean they cease to exist and shouldn't there be another alternative to living besides criminality?

Just some thoughts.