Urbanization.
The
world is urbanizing at a rapid rate with alarming results. Because we live in a
more rural setting, we don’t often notice the concrete evolution unfolding in
other parts of the country. But what are
some of the consequences of urbanization? Why does it matter and should I just
cope with the fact that often it will take me longer than 15 seconds to turn
left onto Highway 93 sans the saving grace of a traffic light? Now is where you
can sit back and wish for the “good ‘ol days…”
City
landscapes are potent signs of visible gross inequality in America. Monstrous skyscrapers
enveloping makeshift shacks; men and women sleeping on the pavement silhouetted
against the neon signs of all varieties. Our urban centers have become
polarized: two cities existing side by side but separated by status and rights.
Urbanization
is a classic tale of the haves and have-nots, where some profit immensely while
others struggle to survive. One of the most tragic manifestations of this sort
of inequality is persistent and growing homelessness – people left without the
protection of a physical space or the security that their inherent human rights
should offer. We’ve addressed this topic before, that housing should be a right
and not a privilege.
Homelessness
presents itself in different ways in different contexts. The most common and
visible are those who are forced to live in the open. Over the years, we see
these people in increasing numbers in the Flathead. They sleep, eat and stay in
public spaces, often subject to daily public scrutiny, harsh weather,
condemnation and potential violence. Others are invisible, especially where
homelessness manifests in very poorer housing conditions without basic services
and security of tenure. Homeless people face stigmatization, criminalization
and discrimination every day.
Inequality
is the most consistently identified cause of homelessness, and yet homelessness
is the least discussed representation of inequality. Think about that for a
minute. When the last time homelessness was was was addressed as a key talking
point at a national political convention?
Perhaps
this is because homelessness is too often attributed to individual
circumstances and moral failures instead being seen as the result of systematic
failures or just simple misfortune that is so severe a family or person cannot
recover and loses nearly everything they own.
I
also surmise that things would be different if the homeless voted in large
blocks. But since they don’t, their plight is not addressed with as much vigor
or tenacity as, say, a lobbyist or an industry that makes substantial
donations. The response should be clear: states must commit to leading the way in
regards to ending homelessness. This would line up with the global target to
ensure adequate housing for all by 2030, which was recently committed to in the
UN’s sustainable development goals.
A
good start would be for states to begin creating national strategies based on
human right, but do so through legislation and not merely activism, to claim
the right to housing for those who continue to live in homelessness. Everyone
benefits when the community works together. Urbanization doesn’t have to be a
detrimental thing.
No comments:
Post a Comment